Developmentally Appropriate
Practice: + or -?
Q. Is it a good idea, or a bad idea, for public schools to
be getting into the child-care business? Seems like they're putting too much on
their plate again. And it seems to be improper governmental impingement on
local private-sector child-care. Bottom line: does it make kids better
learners?
Full-time, school-based day care is actually bad for
children later on, and ominous for future discipline problems - disobedience,
destruction of property and fighting - in public schools, research shows. With
increasing use of school buildings for breakfast / morning latchkey day-care,
as well as after-school care to 6 p.m. and so forth, it appears that "school
sour" is going to becoming an increasing problem because of parents who place
their children at school for too many hours of the day.
The number of hours children spend in day care is linked to
the level of behavior problems they have later in life, according to a federal
study published in the scientific journal, Child
Development. The researchers found that, as the hours of day care
increased, the reports of problem behavior generally increased right along with
them. Researcher Sarah Friedman said the findings held true for all income
groups of children in all out-of-home structured settings.
It creates a condition known as "school sour," where boredom
from being in the same setting in the early morning hours and late afternoon
hours, too, spreads into the regular school day. While often being at home is
even worse, if there is no supervision and thus there are safety hazards and no
one helping the child with homework and so on, it still appears clear that
school-aged children are not thriving in after-school programs even though the
staff and activities might be different than what they have in the regular
school day.
Another study, from the University of Minnesota, showed a
significant increase in hormonal measurements of stress among preschoolers in
day care. The hormone is called "cortisol." Those measurements fell for those
same children on days they spent at home.
A third, by the National Institute of Child Health and Human
Development (NICHD) -- the most comprehensive ever conducted -- found that the
more time children spent in non-parental day care arrangements, the more likely
they were to display aggression, disobedience, and conflict with adults. That
does appear to put schools in the awkward position of contributing to the bad
behavior of the very students whose bad behavior they criticize constantly!
Of course, the
reason public schools are getting in to early childhood education is that it serves
working parents' day-care needs and brings in revenue. But with increasing
evidence that full-time, out-of-home day care is bad for children and hampers learning
later on, public policymakers may want to reconsider the billions of federal
dollars going to subsidized day care, including in schools. A better idea is to
cut government spending to lessen the tax burden so more parents can stay home
for more of those crucial early years.
Homework: The best solution is
to cut your working hours or shift them so that you don't need to use
school-based day care. Or enroll your child in a latchkey program at a church,
if there's transportation available. If you're a working parent who needs
day-care and also a full-time income, can you arrange a work schedule that
allows you to be home with your children after school? Can you trade child-care
or other duties with a neighbor so that your children don't have to be in school
longer than six or seven hours a day? If you'd like to advocate for better
child-care options, outside of public schools, use excerpts from the
book, Day Care Deception by Brian
Robertson, in letters to the editor, and send parents who need day care to
private-sector providers.